商务英语网 商务英语网
  • 首页
  • 商务英语听力
  • 商务英语翻译
  • 商务英语阅读
  • 商务英语比赛
  • 商务英语口语
  • 商务英语词汇
  • 商务英语写作
首页 › 商务英语阅读 › Better Not Squash

Better Not Squash

Biz
4 年前

Companies weed out middle managers at their peril

Every large business has a boss and minions, who do most of the work. What comes between the corner office and the shop floor is a matter of managerial preference. Some firms’ organisational charts are towering mille-feuilles, with staff piled into rigid hierarchies stuffed with assorted supervisors. More fashionable of late has been the pancake organigram: fewer layers of workers reporting to a smaller cadre of chieftains. As appealing as such “flat” organisations might seem, the thinning of managerial ranks comes at great cost.

Vice-presidents, area supervisors and other department heads were once the corporate machine’s central cogs. Now such middle managers are derided as pound-shop CEOs, there largely to organise and attend pointless meetings. A few modish startups bill themselves as having no administrative tiers at all, leaving independent employees flitting between tasks as they see fit. Such holacracy, as it is dubbed, clearly won’t do for a Unilever or Goldman Sachs. But even big firms now ritually boast about “delayering” their ranks.

Flat organisations are meant to reflect the modern workplace. Businesses in generations past used to be steeply hierarchical to mimic the armed forces, remembered by bosses of yesteryear as a place where missions were accomplished. Starting off at the bottom of a pyramid, perhaps six or seven rungs below the top brass, wasn’t so bad if you intended to progress at the same firm for your entire career. Millennials and later Gen-Z recruits had other ideas. Reporting to an overbearing boss crimped their ability to make an immediate mark.

Several factors contributed to the “flattening” trend. Businesses discovered that having lots of mini-barons could lead to stultifying silos. New ways of working – starting with modern technology – mean that executives can manage more subordinates, including some far away. Add enough direct reports to each supervisor, and the number of rungs between the chief executive and the graduate trainee shrinks accordingly.

Proponents of flat organisations say they give each employee added responsibility: bosses with dozens of flunkeys can hardly be expected to micromanage them. Uncluttered organigrams make companies more agile, enable faster decision-making and trim costs to boot. Business titans like Elon Musk of Tesla, a car firm, have painted delayering as a way of improving communication and shedding corporate deadweight.

Clearly, there are limits to how far one can go. Not every Tesla factory hand is going to seek their annual appraisal from Mr. Musk. In fact, any amount of delayering hacks away at what it means for an employee to be part of a company. The key corollary – indeed the enabling factor – of flat organisations is for each employee to have less boss. That will sound appealing to some workers.

Such bosslessness, however, is a false Utopia. Companies that went furthest in scrapping management tiers discovered that getting rid of a formal pecking order resulted in informal hierarchies taking hold instead. A leadership vacuum risks being filled by petty tyranny. It is inevitable when large groups of people spend time together, in the office or elsewhere, that someone ends up in charge (and often lots of people end up in charge of different little tasks). That can be layers of managers put in place formally according to their competence and track record. Or, if everyone is on paper holacratically equal, it might be whoever talks loudest at meetings.

Fewer tiers mean fewer people with day-to-day experience of corralling employees. Yet managing others is not an ancillary task which companies do to reach other aims. It is the precondition for any of their aims to be reached. Sometimes skimping on the degree to which each human resource is supervised doesn’t matter much. But there inevitably comes a time – for the employee or the company – when it matters a great deal. Having lots of organisational tiers means that those in charge of managing lots of people have had experience managing fewer people before.

Covid-19 has already upended many individuals’ working lives. Gone are the days of sitting every day in the same office as your co-workers. Plenty will be adapting to the new managerial normal for a while yet. That makes keeping employees in the loop and engaged more important than ever. Layers of bosses provide structure. For all the joy of belittling them, middle managers are part of the solution.

3
Stake Claims
上一篇
Out-of-Office Experience
下一篇

猜你喜欢

  • How to Get People to Resign
  • The Signals of Workplace Submissiveness
  • The Employee Awards for 2024
  • How to Inspire People
  • Jet Set

Biz

667
文章
0
评论
656
获赞

相关文章

2022年下半年法律英语证书全国统一考试公告
3 年前
第十一届全国国际贸易职业技能竞赛(个人赛)
4 年前
2021年全国高等院校商务英语专业建设研修班通知
4 年前
第二届“中语智汇杯”全国大学生国际商务谈判大赛
2 年前
什么是“去增长”?
4 年前
2025年上半年国才考试报名通知
7 月前
The Crab-like Career
1 年前
2024年下半年ETTBL商务英语翻译全国统一考试通知
10 月前
2025年上半年商务英语翻译全国统一考试通知
4 月前
2021年商务英语课程建设名师讲堂
4 年前
Copyright © 2020-2025 商务英语网. Designed by nicetheme. 渝公网安备50010602502291 渝ICP备2020014586号-2
  • 职场30
  • 苹果公司16
  • 全国商务英语实践大赛15
  • 亿学杯全国商务英语实践技能大赛15
  • 国才考试15
  • 商务英语听力
  • 商务英语翻译
  • 商务英语考试
  • 商务英语阅读
  • 商务英语词汇
close
会员购买 你还没有登录,请先登录
  • ¥15 VIP-1个月
  • ¥80 VIP-半年
  • ¥150 VIP-1年
在线支付 激活码

立即支付
微信支付
支付宝
请使用 支付宝 或 微信 扫码支付